This
is one of the most challenging questions about life that medical
science has courageously answered, despite the fact that other
intellectual pursuits — ranging from theology to philosophy,
anthropology and sociology — have varied opinions.
Psychiatry, as a medical discipline, has
had the enormous responsibility of determining the normalcy or otherwise
of the mind having her basic root in the biological sciences, as she
attempts to answer a question with strong sociological flavour. This
question is as old as creation, but with more potent relevance in our
world today.
It’s amazing how folks invest so much
money to travel to the ends of the earth in assuring that important
organs that keep vegetative life going are in good condition, but with
little regard for finding out whether the mind is functioning well; yet,
the mind is the most crucial organ that the human being is blessed
with. Men can perform prodigies when they have no limbs, blind or even
deaf, but he is completely rattled when the basic functioning of his
mind is disturbed.
However, as much as we treat the care of
our minds with levity, we paradoxically demonstrate its indispensability
in many of our sociological contracts, especially in marriage, where
some relationships have been unfairly aborted based on unconfirmed
history of mental illness in the family of a potential partner. I am
aware of some state governments who compile names of those who have ever
had any visit to a psychiatrist as part of those who could be laid off
in case of staff rationing.
This mental illness label has been
employed in the recent past as a subtle threat for those who commit
traffic offence that political office holders commit with impunity.
Where a political opponent appears stronger than the incumbent, his
budding political career may be shattered once an evidence of a visit to
a psychiatrist is established. Struggles for the royal stool is also
not spared in this stigmatisation campaign and the crucial issue is that
in the contemporary African tradition, the premise for determining the
abnormality of the mind is not only spurious but inconsistent and can be
cheaply abused.
The situation could be likened to the
‘witch-hunt’ scenario of the church around the 18th century that saw the
inhuman confinement of individuals with sound mind into lunatic asylum.
Our belief in the world of the spirit has made the recognition of
mental illness very difficult for the public. While some have been
mislabelled, a good number of folks with mental illness have been
concealed. The critical but vague distinction between faith and delusion
has been the breeding ground for mental illness and its indulgence.
Some have even administered congregations
through hearing of voices that others cannot hear as they inspire
multitudes with paranoid ideas. Beautiful marriages have been destroyed,
just as emerging strong careers are sacrificed when treatable mental
illnesses are not appropriately referred.
A man, who is described as only ‘angry
like his father’ when he brings out a cutlass in an attempt to kill his
wife after an argument, is mentally ill. There are many authorities in
our religious and socio-cultural milieu who have varied and confusing
criteria to determine and even treat mental illness.
Technically, a mind malfunctions when the
behaviour it facilitates causes distress to self, to significant others
— especially his immediate family members; and such behaviour is an
oddity within the particular society. In a very religious country like
Nigeria, a good number of clients are brought to the psychiatrist in a
situation where their religious activities, either in terms of prayers,
fasting or other observances, have caused them or their spouses personal
distress.
There are abnormal behavioural patterns
peculiar to certain cultures, but which are no less mental illnesses in
that they incapacitate folks from fulfilling their roles to self and
society irrespective of our socio-cultural rationalisations. A high
index of pragmatic suspicion is crucial, based on the criteria set out,
so that we can have a sane society.
We cannot continue to employ our cultural
and inconsistent religious criteria to diagnose mental illness. This
becomes very necessary because mental illness can be properly managed
and such patients can live a successful life thereafter. It is now
certain that the voices that the mentally ill complain of are not from
the spirits, since they disappear when drugs are administered.
Psychiatric consultation is not meant only for the mentally ill, but
also for those who have distressful experiences such as disturbances in
sleep, altered appetite for food and sex, crawling sensations in the
head, undue irritability and even nightmares which have occurred over
time. The unbridled desire by our leaders to amass wealth for self
aggrandizement at the expense of service to others may be a subtle
manifestation of mental illness.
No comments:
Post a Comment